The Current Status of UAVs
UAVs
Currently,
there are many civilian purposes for UAVs in the United States. This is huge in
infrastructure industries, to include telecommunications, power and utilities,
oil and gas pipelines, mining, wind turbines, and solar energy. UAVs increases
safety, providing imagery for inspections on tall structures. Inspections
traditionally been carried out by climbing the structures. (Advantages, n.d.). This is wonderful news, because my research
from (Fall Statistics, n.d.) reports that their information from the OSHA, The
Department of Labor, and the CDC, report that over 76,000 non-fatal
work-related falls resulted in injury in 2009, and 800 fatal workplace falls
happened in 2014. Falls are the second leading cause of work-related fatalities
in the U.S. Even choosing to set aside concern for the well-being of those
entrusting you with their employment, the cost of OSHA citations, litigations,
and settlement are massive. It would be great to eliminate these statistics all
together with the use of UAVs. Other uses of the UAVs, are used by videographers,
surveying on construction sites, hurricane hunting, 3-D mapping, farmers use
UAVs for crop inspection, protecting wildlife, scientist and universities, and
companies that use thermal imaging (Smith, S. n.d). All of these purposes can
translate to scores of man-hours saved, reducing inspection times, and a
positive decrease in safety issues.
Below, are
the current regulations on UAVs, found from (Fly, 2017, December 14).
·
Be
at least 16 years old
·
Pass
an aeronautical knowledge test at an FAA-approved knowledge testing center
·
Unmanned aircraft must weigh less
than 55 lbs. (25 kg).
·
Visual line-of-sight (VLOS) only;
the unmanned aircraft must remain within VLOS of the remote pilot in command
and the person manipulating the flight controls of the small UAS.
Alternatively, the unmanned aircraft must remain within VLOS of the visual
observer.
·
At all times, the small unmanned
aircraft must remain close enough to the remote pilot in command and the person
manipulating the flight controls of the small UAS for those people to be
capable of seeing the aircraft with vision unaided by any device other than
corrective lenses.
·
Small unmanned aircraft may not
operate over any persons not directly participating in the operation, not under
a covered structure, and not inside a covered stationary vehicle.
·
Daylight-only operations, or civil
twilight (30 minutes before official sunrise to 30 minutes after official
sunset, local time) with appropriate anti-collision lighting.
·
Must yield right of way to other
aircraft.
·
May use visual observer (VO) but not
required.
·
First-person view camera cannot
satisfy “see-and-avoid” requirement but can be used as long as requirement is
satisfied in other ways.
·
Maximum groundspeed of 100 mph (87
knots).
·
Maximum altitude of 400 feet above
ground level (AGL) or, if higher than 400 feet AGL, remain within 400 feet of a
structure.
·
Minimum weather visibility of 3
miles from control station.
·
Operations in Class B, C, D and E
airspace are allowed with the required ATC permission.
·
Operations in Class G airspace are
allowed without ATC permission.
·
No person may act as a remote pilot
in command or VO for more than one unmanned aircraft operation at one time.
·
No operations from a moving
aircraft.
·
No operations from a moving vehicle
unless the operation is over a sparsely populated area.
·
No careless or reckless operations.
·
No carriage of hazardous materials.
·
Requires preflight inspection by the
remote pilot in command.
·
A person may not operate a small
unmanned aircraft if he or she knows or has reason to know of any physical or
mental condition that would interfere with the safe operation of a small UAS.
·
Foreign-registered small unmanned
aircraft are allowed to operate under part 107 if they satisfy the requirements
of part 375.
·
External load operations are allowed
if the object being carried by the unmanned aircraft is securely attached and
does not adversely affect the flight characteristics or controllability of the
aircraft.
·
Transportation of property for
compensation or hire allowed provided that the aircraft, including its attached
systems, payload and cargo weigh less than 55 pounds total; o The flight is
conducted within visual line of sight and not from a moving vehicle or
aircraft; and o The flight occurs wholly within the bounds of a State and does
not involve transport between (1) Hawaii and another place in Hawaii through
airspace outside Hawaii; (2) the District of Columbia and another place in the
District of Columbia; or (3) a territory or possession of the United States and
another place in the same territory or possession. •
·
Most of the restrictions discussed
above are waivable if the applicant demonstrates that his or her operation can
safely be conducted under the terms of a certificate of waiver.
I do foresee UAVs integrating into
the National Airspace, NAS, because of safety and security problems that can potentially
arise. These UAVs need to be maned properly because they could in fact fall out
of the sky and cause harm to people and/or property. Since a drone is highly
portable, some drones can be carried in and out of nearly any location on foot.
This is great for companies trying to be green, their footprint being nonexistent.
But, this characteristic of the drone, being able to go anywhere is not so
great for security, which can cause some thought for concern. I feel that
staying on top of the ownership and usage of the UAVs is critical. If for any
reason this process falls behind, the UAVs can fall into the hands of the wrong
people and the outcome, devastating.
The military have been using UAVs,
and I believe these machines have transformed military strategy. The incredible
transfer of risk that UAVs offer, cannot be ignored. Drones can be used to
protect the lives of our men and women in the military. Intel that a UAV can
provide the troops before rushing into combat has and will continue to save
lives and make combat more forgiving, and save more lives of the enemy's,
innocent civilians. UAVs make combat more intelligent, the information gained
can mean the choice of going to war or not going to war, dropping a bomb or not
dropping a bomb. Financially, a drone may be costly to build and operate, but,
there is no comparison between the life of a robot to the life of a human.
I did find an advertisement for UAV
jobs at https://flyguys.io/Pilots This
position is to become a Drone Pilot, for a company named Fly Guys. I feel that
we will be seeing more and more advertisements for these types of positions in
the near future. Without a doubt, I can see the benefits of having UAVs in our
life.
Advantages
of Drone Aerial Inspections over Traditional Inspection Methods | Inspectifly,
LLC. (n.d.). Retrieved February 10, 2018, from http://inspectifly.com/advantages-drone-aerial-inspections-traditional-methods/
Fall
Statistics: The Alarming Truth About Labor Environments. (n.d.). Retrieved February
09, 2018, from http://ww.safetyrailcompany.com/pages/Fall-Statistics.html.
Fly
under the small UAS rule. (2017, December 14). Retrieved February 10, 2018,
from http://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/part_107/
I've noticed that several of the jobs available are for smaller companies. I believe larger companies a re still waiting for the FAA to waive the beyond the visual line of sight rule so that they can expand their operations. UPS has already started testing these drone, but until the FAA give commercial operator the green light US companies have to hold tight.
ReplyDeleteThere is no doubt that the usage of UAVs, for certain activities, drastically enhances the safety of people, particularly within certain work fields. I personally know that in Italy the police use drones to inspect areas and see if there is the presence of asbestos on roofs or buildings, which is a toxic material. Also, firefighters use UAVs with special sensors to inspect buildings that are thought to have gas leaks. They also use them to inspect building after an earthquake and evaluate the best course of actions to take in order to save the lives of people that maybe trapped underneath the rubble.
ReplyDelete-Nenne747-
In your paragraph about integrating the UAVs into the NAS you said the unmanned vehicles should be manned properly, I thought it was ironic and kind of funny. But seriously though, I understand your concern for security. I just don't think the integration of the UAVs will eliminate that risk. You can argue that it'll reduce it but I think that threat remains. And even the way things stand, it's not as easy as it may seem to use a drone for harm.
ReplyDeleteI liked the paragraph on it;s benefits for the military, I agree and had similar views.